From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sat Apr 3 12:58:25 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4B75B4254 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 12:58:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@karels.net) Received: from mail.karels.net (mail.karels.net [216.160.39.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCH6814dDz4S8b for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 12:58:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@karels.net) Received: from mail.karels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.karels.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 133CwHau060776; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 07:58:17 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mike@karels.net) Message-Id: <202104031258.133CwHau060776@mail.karels.net> To: Mark Millard cc: freebsd-arm From: Mike Karels Reply-to: mike@karels.net Subject: Re: Has anyone successfully booted the "B+" model of RPi3 via any of 13.0-RC3/4/5? In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 02 Apr 2021 21:53:38 -0700. <632BDD3C-EB29-4E89-9069-E8E2D836AC28@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <60774.1617454697.1@mail.karels.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 07:58:17 -0500 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FCH6814dDz4S8b X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mike@karels.net designates 216.160.39.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mike@karels.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.65 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[mike@karels.net]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[mike]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[216.160.39.52:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:216.160.39.52]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[karels.net]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[216.160.39.52:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.968]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.48)[-0.479]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.com]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:216.160.36.0/22, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 12:58:25 -0000 > Subject: Has anyone successfully booted the "B+" model of RPi3 via any o= f > 13.0-RC3/4/5? > Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 21:53:38 -0700 > To: freebsd-arm > From: Mark Millard via freebsd-arm I have RC3 running on a 1 GB RPi3B+: FreeBSD 13.0-RC3 #0 releng/13.0-n244696-8f731a397ad: Fri Mar 19 05:54:12 U= TC 2021 root@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/sys/GENERI= C arm64 FreeBSD clang version 11.0.1 (git@github.com:llvm/llvm-project.git llvmorg= -11.0.1-0-g43ff75f2c3fe) VT(efifb): resolution 1824x984 module firmware already present! real memory =3D 993841152 (947 MB) avail memory =3D 947474432 (903 MB) It has the same version of start4.elf that you cited. I haven't done much testing on it though. Mike > I ask because: > https://github.com/raspberrypi/firmware/commits/master > shows a 2021-Mar-23 firmware update described as: > "firmware: board-info: Fix memsize on 3B+" > and 13.0-RC2 and before had other, more general > problems from pre-2021-Feb-25 firmware. > A sufficiently recent snapshot build of main [14] > is also a good test but it is more difficult to check > if it is recent enough (compared to just referencing > the 13.0-RC* text): > # strings /boot/*/start4.elf | grep VC_BUILD_ID_ > VC_BUILD_ID_USER: dom > VC_BUILD_ID_TIME: 12:10:40 > VC_BUILD_ID_VARIANT: start > VC_BUILD_ID_TIME: Feb 25 2021 > VC_BUILD_ID_BRANCH: bcm2711_2 > VC_BUILD_ID_HOSTNAME: buildbot > VC_BUILD_ID_PLATFORM: raspberrypi_linux > VC_BUILD_ID_VERSION: 564e5f9b852b23a330b1764bcf0b2d022a20afd0 (clean) > (But the /boot/... style path presumes the boot was > successful. Other means of mounting the media would > otherwise be involved.) > I do not have access to any old-style-revision code > 0010 or 0013 RPi*'s (so B+: with 512 MiByte RAM) or > new-style-revision code a020d3 RPi*'s (so: B+ with 1 > GiByte RAM). (These are the RPi3B's that have a "+" > after the B: RPi3B+. "+" is not "and later" here.) > =3D=3D=3D > Mark Millard > marklmi at yahoo.com > ( dsl-only.net went > away in early 2018-Mar)