Date: 08 Jul 2000 03:18:34 +0200 From: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@no-spam.citeweb.net> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, Kenjiro Cho <kjc@csl.sony.co.jp>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /sys hierarchy Message-ID: <og49ctcl.fsf@pc166.gits.fr> In-Reply-To: Warner Losh's message of "Wed, 05 Jul 2000 20:48:10 -0600" References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000705132519.28854D-100000@fledge.watson.org> <200007060248.UAA46767@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner Losh <imp@village.org> writes: > In message <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000705132519.28854D-100000@fledge.watson.org> Robert Watson writes: > : On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, John Baldwin wrote: > : > : > The headers will always be installed in the right place in > : > /usr/include: Makefile's are editable. As far as kernel > : > compiles, symlinks can be created in the work directory as > : > one possible solution. For example, > : > sys/compile/i386/GENERIC/netinet -> ../../../../net/inet. > : > This would most likely result in netinet _not_ being split > : > up. > : > : As much as I'd love a complete cleanup of sys/, this cure seems to be > : worse than the problem. :-) Take this as another vote to leave net/ as > : is, if only to keep the includes in kernel code in sync with includes in > : userland code :-). > > The proposed change also breaks the ability to have /usr/include/* be > symbolic links to your real source tree. I don't understand where is the problem to split net* to net/* ? could you explain ? please. Cyrille. -- home:mailto:clefevre@no-spam.citeweb.net Supprimer "no-spam." pour me repondre. work:mailto:Cyrille.Lefevre@no-spam.edf.fr Remove "no-spam." to answer me back. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?og49ctcl.fsf>