From owner-freebsd-questions Thu May 1 22:39:56 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA14477 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 1 May 1997 22:39:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mixcom.mixcom.com (mixcom.mixcom.com [198.137.186.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA14472 for ; Thu, 1 May 1997 22:39:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mixcom.mixcom.com (8.6.12/2.2) id AAA14699; Fri, 2 May 1997 00:40:42 -0500 Received: from p75.mixcom.com(198.137.186.25) by mixcom.mixcom.com via smap (V1.3) id sma014638; Fri May 2 00:40:15 1997 Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970502004015.00b163f4@mixcom.com> X-Sender: sysop@mixcom.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 00:40:15 -0500 To: Terry Lambert From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Subject: Re: Problem Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 01:09 PM 5/1/97 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: --big snip-- >You are aware that you can not mix versions fo sendmail and bind and >changes in versions of FreeBSD networking structures, right? You must >rebuild (a *matched*!) sendmail and bind if you update past a structure >change. If you replace sendmail (or bind), you must generally replace >bind (or sendmail) at the same time. This was especially problematic >when they were both "sanitized" for Linux style cshared library usage. Never heard this rule before? Is this because FBSD modified the original source and only applies to FBSD? ------------------------------------------- Jeff Mountin - System/Network Administrator jeff@mixcom.net MIX Communications Serving the Internet since 1990