Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 Aug 2001 01:21:25 +0400
From:      "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
Cc:        Oliver Fromme <olli@secnetix.de>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Why is csh tcsh?  This can be a bad thing...
Message-ID:  <20010827012122.A25340@nagual.pp.ru>
In-Reply-To: <3B8966C8.46BD4F84@mindspring.com>
References:  <20010826015413.C92548@dragon.nuxi.com> <200108261120.NAA07025@lurza.secnetix.de> <20010826154728.A19673@nagual.pp.ru> <3B8966C8.46BD4F84@mindspring.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 14:14:48 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> 
> While we may be stuck with this bait-and-switch "upgrade", I
> think his complaints are not co easily addressed.  Certainly,
> the "exec" complaint remains valid, in any case: it's a bug
> that csh didn't have.

Complaints _are_ easily addressed, tcsh author is responsible and fix all
thing that I report to him. If you complain about 'upgrade' problem, i.e.
we don't have latest tcsh, ask our tcsh maintainer for upgrade.

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010827012122.A25340>