From owner-freebsd-current Sun Aug 26 14:21:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0699037B403 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 14:21:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) id f7QLLSf25374; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 01:21:29 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 01:21:25 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" To: Terry Lambert Cc: Oliver Fromme , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Message-ID: <20010827012122.A25340@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20010826015413.C92548@dragon.nuxi.com> <200108261120.NAA07025@lurza.secnetix.de> <20010826154728.A19673@nagual.pp.ru> <3B8966C8.46BD4F84@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3B8966C8.46BD4F84@mindspring.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 14:14:48 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > While we may be stuck with this bait-and-switch "upgrade", I > think his complaints are not co easily addressed. Certainly, > the "exec" complaint remains valid, in any case: it's a bug > that csh didn't have. Complaints _are_ easily addressed, tcsh author is responsible and fix all thing that I report to him. If you complain about 'upgrade' problem, i.e. we don't have latest tcsh, ask our tcsh maintainer for upgrade. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message