Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:21:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> To: roam@ringlet.net Cc: jeh@FreeBSD.org, sobomax@FreeBSD.org, cjclark@alum.mit.edu, rwatson@FreeBSD.org, dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie, alex@big.endian.de, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf Message-ID: <200108211221.f7LCLPq22354@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <20010821143957.G7824@ringworld.oblivion.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 21 Aug, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Still, this would be a good temporary workaround until a more > elaborate scheme, like the one described by Robert Watson in another > message in this thread, is deployed; but, as Robert says, a more > elaborate scheme might lower performance.. Can we control the ports just like we control devices? With file permissions? Then the admin will be able to use chown/chmod to grant permissions to particular ports: chmod g+rw /net/udp6/talk for example... The will require a portfs or some such, of course. -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200108211221.f7LCLPq22354>