Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 13:36:16 +1000 (EST) From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> To: petrilli@amber.org (Christopher Petrilli) Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VPN for FreeBSD 2.2.8 and 3.2 Message-ID: <199908230336.NAA21519@cheops.anu.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <19990822231452.A18458@amber.org> from "Christopher Petrilli" at Aug 22, 99 11:14:52 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In some mail from Christopher Petrilli, sie said: > > On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 01:11:23PM +1000, Darren Reed wrote: > > In some mail from Nicholas Brawn, sie said: > > > > > > Have a look at www.kame.net, and see if it fits your requirements. KAME is > > > a freely available IPv6 & IPSec stack for BSD (developed in Japan). > > > > You mean it's not yet integrated into FreeBSD ?! > > No, and never will be so long as ITAR stands, and the FreeBSD group is > based in the UNited States. This is why OpenBSD has to jump through so > many hoops to stay legal. Bah, so FreeBSD will be InSecureBSD ? Well, so long as the ITAR bear stands around making grizzly noises at people, it seems. > Unfortunately, the KAME integation isn't for the faint of heart. > Chris FreeBSD appears to be doing better than the other two groups in terms of resources...there are ways around it although I'm disappointed to see that FreeBSD isn't interested. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908230336.NAA21519>