From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Mar 16 18:10:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [209.152.133.57]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C894837B718 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 18:10:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f2H2Abd09678; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 18:10:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 18:10:36 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Dima Dorfman Cc: James Housley , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Inherate nodump cause significant slow down of dump Message-ID: <20010316181036.H9267@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org References: <3AB2B8BA.29C5E58E@thehousleys.net> <20010317011847.EA9083E1E@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010317011847.EA9083E1E@bazooka.unixfreak.org>; from dima@unixfreak.org on Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 05:18:47PM -0800 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 05:18:47PM -0800, Dima Dorfman wrote: > I'm not terribly opposed to this, but OTOH I don't see why it's > necessary. Agreed. > The slowdown only occurs if you set nodump on a directory. ..snip.. > In other words, the only thing that's broken is the new feature. I guess I need to read the report again. I don't see where there is a bug. There is a great slowdown in operating time -- ie a performance nit, but no bug. But as you said, if you want -h; you have to spend the time processing. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message