Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:23:51 +0400 From: Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r312399 - head/security/ipv6toolkit Message-ID: <51206967.3090800@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <20130217051144.GA38688@FreeBSD.org> References: <201302170409.r1H49T5G066958@svn.freebsd.org> <20130217051144.GA38688@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexey Dokuchaev wrote on 17.02.2013 09:11: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 04:09:29AM +0000, Hiroki Sato wrote: >> New Revision: 312399 >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/312399 >> >> Log: >> The distfile was re-rolled. > > And the differences (old vs. new) turned out to be?... > > ./danfe According to original PR: """ I compared the observed tarball contents to the git commit noted below, and found only these differences in the tarball relative to the repository: - add data/ipv6toolkit.conf - add data/oiu.txt - change whitespace in manuals/frag6.1 https://github.com/fgont/ipv6-toolkit/commit/1e7a5d45f5c7ed0f113c87b1b5d4b7b6c680fdb8 """ But this should be also mentioned in commit message, yes. -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51206967.3090800>