Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 Aug 2005 12:11:42 -1000
From:      juli mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        juli mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libufs Makefile
Message-ID:  <20050828221142.GA71466@toxic.magnesium.net>
In-Reply-To: <20050826062242.734ffae4@localhost>
References:  <200508251022.j7PAMWFO030767@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050825195416.GA65980@toxic.magnesium.net> <20050826062242.734ffae4@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> [ Date: 2005-08-26 ]
	[ w.r.t. Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libufs Makefile ]
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:54:16 -1000
> juli mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> 
> > * Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> [ Date: 2005-08-25 ]
> > 	[ w.r.t. cvs commit: src/lib/libufs Makefile ]
> > > trhodes     2005-08-25 10:22:30 UTC
> > > 
> > >   FreeBSD src repository
> > > 
> > >   Modified files:
> > >     lib/libufs           Makefile 
> > >   Log:
> > >   Hook getino.3 up to the build and link it to putino.3.
> > >   
> > >   PR:     83820
> > 
> > This is wrong.  As the PR states it was purposely not hooked up.
> > inode.c doesn't have functions which look like the interfaces you've
> > just published, and there isn't even a putino(3) in there.  If the
> > cause of the confusion is the manpage being listed in Xr's or
> > something, then comment out the Xr's.  This is very obviously wrong,
> > if you try to use what's in the manpage I committed.  Probably it
> > shoudln't be in CVS at all.  The reason I put it there at the time is
> > that it was ready and inode.c was about ready to hit CVS, but that
> > got dropped.  Now, if you want to help me remember what P4 tree that
> > inode.c was in, and pick up whereever I left off, that'd be awesome.
> 
> Let me understand real quick, it was purposely not hooked up because
> it was the only file not updated?  I mean, I can back this out,
> no problem; however, I fail to see why nothing is going on with
> this code.  No clue on the branch, sorry.

It was purposely not hooked up because the code that it documents
isn't in CVS.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050828221142.GA71466>