Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 19:10:02 -0600 From: Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu> To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Do I want to switch to the new pkg(8) format? Message-ID: <549E06EA.20008@my.hennepintech.edu> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1412261740280.26354@wonkity.com> References: <CAPi0psuei36LjMFT_B7DF3dWhTz=RK28r-kxKdyeNJx1YSapdg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPi0psv8V7=VZUJS4ND-d=gx4Rh16q8p3p-y2Naac0WCRzcT2w@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.11.1412261740280.26354@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2014.12.26 18:48, Warren Block wrote: > Actually, pkg_cutleaves is a port and should be okay to use. The name > is due to it trying to look like the old pkg_* system programs. > Probably we should say "do not use /usr/sbin/pkg_*". Unless it has been updated recently, pkg_cutleaves doesn't support pkgng. It does some weird things that make it look like it kind of works, but it doesn't. pkg-rmleaf, however, does work with pkgng.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?549E06EA.20008>