From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 10 19:37:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D43106566B; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:37:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kimelto@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4662D8FC19; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:37:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwg5 with SMTP id 5so1943277qwg.13 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:37:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=HaN3Ib/UKIQAA9Z0CQzzwVFbD/a8uYp/yKB04o8DHac=; b=nebrUHzy375oSDaVBc8GCj1xpqVc2mCcEgLHmBfqmeJbFe3vk8u7gXJJBnZHNT5nFz EMMw5eOOTUmLC6QDItIn4QBTnPd1SJWGaziyerCX9kD3nWbvpcyNBzZRIuZyxsrVDvDx c8K+jSbjiGeTujSbB6ktDyLb8fnt/1Lr9GBuA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=goKVsbA4kHtYePFjNeqBSmGa+KC2kq+U/Q6NwWEM3pIIFMWS39pNKZETCwoAKhtLAy WmVx6XnZdv2vJjAHU6nucqNXUe6tJRYEoGzEPJwWvWo7mmFkiVaSY0LjZZkcpB4lZN5Z V0V60/lQke8I1zaVSUmM0LofRayR9hyhXAXTY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.181.205 with SMTP id bz13mr836512qcb.137.1284145607867; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:06:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.233.1 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:06:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C8A7ACB.9070408@FreeBSD.org> References: <4C8A5CA0.1050700@feral.com> <4C8A7ACB.9070408@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:06:45 +0200 Message-ID: From: Julien Laffaye To: Doug Barton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: David DEMELIER , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Matthew Jacob Subject: Re: DHCP server in base X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:37:57 -0000 On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > As I've said many times, I'm ready to have it out when there is consensus to > do so. The usual discussion goes like this: > > 1. Get BIND out of the base! > 2. If we remove it, the command line tools (dig, host, nslookup) go with it. DragonflyBSD chose to remove BIND and to use drill as a replacement [1]. Don't know if it meet our requirements, though. [1]: http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/submit/2010-03/msg00003.html