From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May 23 12:42:58 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 88ED516A4CE; Sun, 23 May 2004 12:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huva.hittite.isp.9tel.net (huva.hittite.isp.9tel.net
	[62.62.156.28])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CE53D43D3F; Sun, 23 May 2004 12:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from clefevre-lists@9online.fr)
Received: from pc2k (unknown [81.185.50.207])
	by huva.hittite.isp.9tel.net (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 91EBA9BBA0; Sun, 23 May 2004 21:44:23 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <011701c440fe$23b34ac0$7890a8c0@dyndns.org>
From: "Cyrille Lefevre" <clefevre-lists@9online.fr>
To: "Josef Karthauser" <joe@freebsd.org>,
	"Kay Lehmann" <kay_lehmann@web.de>
References:
	<20040523101300.GA43113@genius.tao.org.uk><40B09066.1020300@web.de>
	<20040523122832.GF40899@genius.tao.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 21:34:17 +0200
Organization: ACME
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: portupgrade and daemons.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 19:42:58 -0000

"Josef Karthauser" <joe@freebsd.org> wrote:
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 01:52:06PM +0200, Kay Lehmann wrote:
> 
> As far as I know this isn't the job of portupgrade. Normally it should 
> be handeled by the port itself, which could stop daemons with 
> appropriate set (de)install targets.
> I think a lot of the ports do this quite properly. Moving this to Mk 
> looks quite complicated and I think it would be the best to leave it in 
> the ports, since they should know what is required to do.
> 

Ah ok.  That makes sense. Do you know of a port that does this properly
off the top of your head?


astro/setiathome at post-install time :)

Cyrille Lefevre.
-- 
home: mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net