From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 11:34:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D425106566C for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:34:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE4D8FC08 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:34:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk35 with SMTP id 35so1501151qyk.13 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 04:34:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.66.7 with SMTP id l7mr1896512qci.185.1319283246289; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 04:34:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-105-057.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.105.57]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id em9sm18884783qab.10.2011.10.22.04.34.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 22 Oct 2011 04:34:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3SQhbb0tTdz2CG4d for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:34:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:34:02 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20111022073402.1745f6dd@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20111022124511.152f777b.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20111022005442.GA68656@whisperer.chthonixia.net> <4E5EF2B000DE2E53@> <20111022124511.152f777b.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEUAAABYRlwJCw4FAgAIBwKprDkBAQFQLR0BAgCir7VRttp8AAACAUlEQVQ4jZWUTYvbMBCGTVl8V2hX6Gg5G5FbWQdBj0lEfE7BhN4cyzi5Wt1E5L70roWy6N92xok/skkP+5IYrMcz78xIduDWpNM3vFzuA/jX5EY1AI6KHFwW/CzFuQAwqUBbV12p+CzIh6Awq7sg33pn5D64SQXAexffeuQlA/L35RrkaB551OjGfP/cAO8mCNaDcgvfky5ijoD0pAXlCQCnljiAjsJD9Ax05Ko5sZxbnLQcmM+dZg5IjREfZrWIHK0JuwU68pAGwHvfRxBundRzTxxz3r9dNUikPsEihjz2Dc4kjp1hKsJGuot4EDxaxzMoC7XqhxhOSfZrTS6gSX1JVdjp+o1PvWfekXgw3WL0g70nDEwA0H0HQsEZc8sTmFMTkWUfYWC/vdR1zQy3xLQgLwzu90QnlnFLjeiGWBjwhb4Sa42IqOg2qqS4O1/zhKokFUb1Q8Rj4Eb69WVflXEehJ35DgChVTE5n50eaGyMLOfH8AOodoSM4PVYAQgQdBulOa+knklYks3vAuQ+uX492lTl+A+e8qBV2AKoXalVKFfyuUp0pUp1ARaUHh82lv9MN+Ig7CZtgE6FNYvjlywT2VP2dMgOG46gTIWcqdfvuwyXNz0oMJNd/N5lh1YNiJt19ADTUo3VuFSNeQwVqRSrGjSCp53fk2g+Mvfk/gfoPxHeUS8MH9vRAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Upgrading libxul, dependency on Firefox 3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:34:07 -0000 On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:45:11 +0200 Polytropon articulated: > I'm not sure if it still applies, but in earlier Firefox > version transitions (and the consideration of dependencies) > some programs depending on libxul would install an outdated > Firefox version. The solution has been WITH_GECKO=libxul in > /etc/make.conf so only the current version of this library > would have been installed in the end. I haven't had that notation in my file in ages and I am not experiencing the problems that the OP is reporting. Perhaps if the OP gave a fuller description of his system, and perhaps a perusal of his file a solution could be more readily deduced. -- Jerry ✌ jerry+fbsd@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or ignored. Do not CC this poster. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html