From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Feb 26 06:26:37 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA10085 for isp-outgoing; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 06:26:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from main.inetnow.net (root@main.inetnow.net [206.137.8.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA10080 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 06:26:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from default (a03-54.inetnow.net [207.76.93.246]) by main.inetnow.net (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id JAA20514 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 09:19:38 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <33144816.1C5A@inetnow.net> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 09:26:30 -0500 From: Adam Alonso Reply-To: pcadam@inetnow.net Organization: MAG Communications X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [H] Optimal computer for FreeBSD References: <199702261329.AA092753791@ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hr.Ladavac wrote: > > E-mail message from Vincent Poy contained: > > On Wed, 26 Feb 1997, Hr.Ladavac wrote: > > > > > With the slight exception of PPro processors where both L1 and L2 caches > > > reside in the same package, albeit on two separate pieces of sillicon... > > > > But doesn't PPro motherboards still have external cache? Also, is > > the PPro actually the P6 chip? if this is the case, what is the code name > > for the Klamath 300Mhz processor Intel will be releasing? > > None that I have seen--agreed, I have only seen ASUS motherboards. AFAIK, > no PC motherboard supports L3 cache. Yes, it used to be known as P6, but > iNTEL had trademark problems with that name. > I dont think they had trademark problems with 'P6'. They would have had trademark problems with '586' or '686' because you cant trademark a number. So when the 586 came out the called it the Pentium instead. Then when the P6 came out they had spent so much money promoting the Pentium so they just called the P6 the Pentium Pro, even though they are totaly separate processoers. I think there was one time that Intel did have a problem with trade marks. When they made the 486DX4-100 it is really only clock trippled, but DX3 was trademarked by some car company, so they called it the DX4. I think. > /Marino > > > > > > Cheers, > > Vince - vince@MCESTATE.COM - vince@GAIANET.NET ________ __ ____ > > Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / | / |[__ ] > > GaiaNet Corporation - M & C Estate / / / / | / | __] ] > > Beverly Hills, California USA 90210 / / / / / |/ / | __] ] > > HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin /_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[____] > > > > > >