Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:34:56 +0000 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> To: Kris Persson <krisp@mlode.com> Cc: apache@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: www/mod_rpaf2 Message-ID: <4E9C9F80.7020407@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <00b801cc8cff$d801d690$880583b0$@com> References: <00b801cc8cff$d801d690$880583b0$@com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/17/11 19:06, Kris Persson wrote: > I use mod_rpaf2 0.6_1 for my apache2.2.x builds the other rpaf is from > apache1.3 why are both being depreciated when mod_rpaf2 0.6_1 is for > apache2.2? Please advise? B/C this port had a very unusual setup and we didn't catch it. deprecating www/mod_rpaf also deprecate www/mod_rpaf2 b/c they are setup as MASTER/SLAVE ports. What should happen is mod_rpaf becomes mod_rpaf2 with the appropriate changes to make it only for 22+, then mod_rpaf can quietly go away when 13/20 do. Feel free to submit a PR to do so. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 VP Infrastructure, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Director Operations, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E9C9F80.7020407>