Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 31 Aug 1999 19:03:39 +0200
From:      Andre Albsmeier <andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de>
To:        Christopher Michaels <ChrisMic@clientlogic.com>
Cc:        "'jb@syndicate.net'" <jb@syndicate.net>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Unacceptably poor samba performance.
Message-ID:  <19990831190339.A21247@internal>
In-Reply-To: <6C37EE640B78D2118D2F00A0C90FCB4401105C0E@site2s1>
References:  <6C37EE640B78D2118D2F00A0C90FCB4401105C0E@site2s1>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 31-Aug-1999 at 11:51:41 -0400, Christopher Michaels wrote:
> Actually the problem is solved.  There is a bug/incompatibility in Samba
> 2.0.5a that causes horrible performance on FreeBSD.  Apparently it's not a
> problem on other OS's.  The changes that were made actually improve
> performance on other OS's.
> 
> Anyway, downgrading is an option except that there are 3 security holes that
> have been fixed in 2.0.5a.  There was a patch/fix posted to the
> comp.protocols.smb news groups by one of the samba dev team.
> 
> I should check back in there an see if there have been any new developments,
> as this was a couple weeks ago now.

My write performance went up to old values with 

	sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0


My read performance increased with

	socket options = TCP_NODELAY

	-Andre


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990831190339.A21247>