From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 7 18:02:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3548F16A420 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 18:02:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fenner@research.att.com) Received: from mail-white.research.att.com (mail-red.research.att.com [192.20.225.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B247E43D49 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 18:02:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fenner@research.att.com) Received: from bright.research.att.com (bright.research.att.com [135.207.20.189]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10ADA8551; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 14:02:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from fenner@localhost) by bright.research.att.com (8.12.11/8.12.10/Submit) id j97I2ZW1024282; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 11:02:35 -0700 From: Bill Fenner Message-Id: <200510071802.j97I2ZW1024282@bright.research.att.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII To: Vivek Khera References: <200510071004.j97A4QAB030233@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 11:02:35 -0700 Versions: dmail (linux) 2.7/makemail 2.14 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports: 1 unfetchable distfiles: databases/slony1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 18:02:37 -0000 Vivek and others who received false positives, My apologies. This is the number one bug on my list to fix. An unfortunate series of circumstances caused the checking cron job to fail for a couple of days in a row before the email went out, resulting in many more false positives than normal. I resurrected the distfile survey 3 weeks ago, and watched it closely for 2 weeks to make sure that it was running smoothly. In retrospect, the timing was particularly bad, since Edwin's email went out just recently, causing lots of upgrades and upgrades are exactly when the distfile survey gets false positives. The distfile survey is a set of scripts that I first wrote in 1997. As with any 8 year old perl project, it's kind of a mess. It's really high on my list to refactor the code to make it easier to implement bugfixes like this, but I know that doesn't make those who are annoyed by getting bogus warnings feel any better. Bill