From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Oct 28 15:06:19 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA28745 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 15:06:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA28740 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 15:06:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA15227; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 15:06:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 15:06:01 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White Reply-To: Doug White To: Leif Neland cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvsup'ing 2.2.5 In-Reply-To: <265_9710282236@swimsuit.roskildebc.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On 28 Oct 1997, Leif Neland wrote: > Is there any point in cvsup'ing releng_2.2.5, or will it stay the same > until 2.2.6 or whatever? (What happened between 2.2.2 and 2.2.5?) There is always new development/bugfixes going into 2.2. Just a few hours after 2.2.5 came out some fixes were committed. So if you wan to stay on the best 2.2, track RELENG_2_2. The RELENG_2_2_5 tag is static and will not be slipped, so once you have it you won't get anything new. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major