From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 1 19:47:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75A316A557 for ; Mon, 1 May 2006 19:47:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: from luke.segpub.com.au (luke.segpub.com.au [64.49.254.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F8C143D72 for ; Mon, 1 May 2006 19:47:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: (qmail 47173 invoked by uid 89); 2 May 2006 05:47:41 +1000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.35?) (eoghan@redry.net@213.202.150.222) by 0 with SMTP; 2 May 2006 05:47:41 +1000 Message-ID: <445665D3.3000208@redry.net> Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 20:47:31 +0100 From: eoghan User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Macintosh/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ahze@ahze.net References: <1146349274.16564.18.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <200604301950.27364.andy@athame.co.uk> <44562619.3090403@freebsd.org> <1146500428.844.3.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <1146511713.3140.4.camel@localhost> <44566395.1070904@redry.net> <445664D5.7070207@redry.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.14 being merged into the tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 19:47:53 -0000 michael johnson wrote: > > > On 5/1/06, *eoghan* > wrote: > > michael johnson wrote: > > > > > > On 5/1/06, *eoghan* > >> wrote: > > > > Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: > > > В пн, 01/05/2006 в 12:20 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke пишет: > > >> On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 17:15 +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > >>> michael johnson schrieb: > > >>> > > >>>>> ahze@ seems to have fixed the note in UPDATING for it, > > although I'm not > > >>>>> sure it's enough. At least x11/kdelibs wants > mDNSResponder, > > and if > > >>>>> avahi is already installed the dependencies will be > recorded > > >>>>> incorrectly. I've already informed kde@ > > >>>> > > >>>> We're working on a fix. Either we will disable > mDNSResponder > > in avahi > > >>> Yes, please. > > >>> > > >>>> or hopefully kde@ will want to use avahi's mDNSResponder. > > >>> This wouldn't help the people running into the CONFLICTS > right > > now (the > > >>> dependencies are already registered in people's pkgdbs when > > they do, > > >>> changing the kdelibs port won't fix that). We can try to > make > > that work > > >>> later. > > >>> > > >>> Also ... seriously, do you guys even check just what is > > depending on the > > >>> things you're setting CONFLICTS with? I really was not > > expecting to see > > >>> anybody pull a fam->gamin again so soon. > > >> We tested this change as we do all GNOME development > > versions. In the > > >> past, GNOME/KDE conflicts were quickly brought to light > by our > > testers. > > >> It seems that this time around, we did not have anyone trying > > GNOME 2.14 > > >> with KDE on the same machine. I was rather shocked > myself to learn > > >> about this and the xpdf/poppler conflict so late. > > > > > > Both problems was reported before here: > > > > > > From: > > > Vladimir Grebenschikov > > > >> > > > Sender: > > > vova@fbsd.ru > > > > To: > > > Jeremy Messenger > >> > > > Cc: > > > Tuc at T-B-O-H < ml@t-b-o-h.net > >>, > > > freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org > freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org > > > > Subject: > > > Re: Suggested mod for > > > gnome_upgradeXXX.sh > > > Date: > > > Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:50:23 +0300 > > > > > > > > > В вс, 19/03/2006 в 11:36 -0600, Jeremy Messenger пишет: > > >> We will be no longer need gnome_upgradeXXX.sh in the > future version > > > of > > >> GNOME. Bless to the ltverhack that fix libtool bug. Upgrade > > GNOME 2.12 > > > to > > >> 2.14 (still in MC) was a lot easier than any previous > version, which > > > it > > >> can be done with portupgrade now. About four to five > steps to do > > it. > > >> Here's what I did with GNOME 2.12 to 2.14: > > >> > > >> pkgdb -Ff (need for gst stuff) > > >> portupgrade -f -o net/avahi howl-\* > > >> portupgrade -a > > >> portupgrade -f -o x11/gnome-screensaver > xscreensaver-gnome-\* > > >> > > >> The steps might be change if there is any better. Like > might be best > > > to > > >> follow UPDATING before do the portupgrade -a. > > > > > > First of all thanks for good work. > > > > > > Unfortunately, I've do this upgrade before above > suggestion, so I was > > > forced to find the solution with howl -> avahi by myself. > > > > > > Also there is one more conflict of this kind: > > > evinice requires poppler, but poppler conflicts with already > > installed > > > xpdf: > > > ===> Installing for poppler-0.5.1 > > > > > > ===> poppler-0.5.1 conflicts with installed package(s): > > > xpdf-3.01_2 > > > > > > They install files into the same place. > > > Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/poppler. > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Regarding poppler... > > Is this a requirement for a successful gnome 2.14 upgrade? > Mine is > > running at the moment, and this did fail... > > > > > > if you want to use the full gnome desktop (evince), than yes. But you > > can keep xpdf installed if you'd rather not have evince. > > > > Michael > > ok thanks > So can i make deinstall xpdf after my portupgrade and make install for > poppler? Should this suffice or will i need to run portupgrade again? > > > Just deinstall xpdf and run portupgade again, we're working on splitting > poppler up a little bit more to not conflict with xpdf. We should have it > ready sometime this evening. > > Michael Thanks Michael I will do that. Eoghan