From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 1 05:05:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370B710662AA for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 05:05:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@mmu.edu.my) Received: from staff.cyber.mmu.edu.my (staff.cyber.mmu.edu.my [203.106.62.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BA08FC14 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 05:05:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@mmu.edu.my) Received: by staff.cyber.mmu.edu.my (Postfix, from userid 0) id 0DA264D53DC; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 12:24:53 +0800 (MYT) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by mmu.edu.my (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14BBF55E4F9 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:28:37 +0800 (MYT) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9475F1A50D9; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:26:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0331065676; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:26:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org) Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E45106566C; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:25:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@c0mplx.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (unknown [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34128FC15; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:25:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@c0mplx.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JelYi-000CgM-Qt; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 07:25:56 +0100 Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 07:25:56 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080327062556.GE3180@home.opsec.eu> References: <47E9448F.1010304@ipfw.ru> <20080326142115.K34007@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Errors-To: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: unionfs status X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 05:05:54 -0000 Vadim Goncharov wrote: > Robert Watson wrote: > > If you're using unionfs > > to take a template system and "broadcast it" to many jails, you probably don't > > want all the jails talking to the same syslogd, you want them each talking to > > their own. When syslogd in a jail finds a disconnected socket, which is > > effectively what a NULL v_socket pointer means, in /var/run/log, it should be > > unlinking it and creating a new socket, not reusing the existing file on disk. > This code's use in jails is primarily intended for mysql (and the like > daemons), not syslogd (for which you said it right). Such daemons really > require broadcasting, yep - so unionfs should support it... Thanks for this description. So we basically have two different uses for UNIX sockets in unionfs with jails ? 1) socket in jail to communicate only inside one jail (syslog-case) 2) socket in jail as a means of IPC between different jails (mysql-case) Is 2) really supposed to work like this ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 12 years to go ! _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"