Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 19:07:17 +0200 From: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> To: Alexander Leidinger <netchild@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Ivan Klymenko <fidaj@ukr.net>, kwm@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, "olli@FreeBSD.org Andriy Gapon" <avg@FreeBSD.org>, Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de>, akirchhoff135014@comcast.net, multimedia@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Linuxolator v4l2/dvb - trying to collect data about latest skype Message-ID: <20110426170717.GB52945@triton8.kn-bremen.de> In-Reply-To: <20110426095558.116775i1hmtqaigw@webmail.leidinger.net> References: <20110422121831.GA37083@triton8.kn-bremen.de> <20110424140350.GA86523@triton8.kn-bremen.de> <20110426095558.116775i1hmtqaigw@webmail.leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:55:58AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> (from Sun, 24 Apr 2011 > 16:03:50 +0200): > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 02:18:31PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> I now have finshed seperating the dvb part of the patches out into > >> a port: > >> > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/dvb/linux_dvbwrapper-kmod.shar > >> > >> and made new src patches that now contain the v4l2 bits only: > >> > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/dvb/linux-v4l2-8-test.patch > >> (for 8, this is what I tested) > >> > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/dvb/linux-v4l2-test.patch > >> (for head, untested) > >> > >> The only outstanding issues I now know of are, > >> > >> a) netchild suggested I try an older videodev2.h from Linux 2.6.17, > >> I'm not sure that's necessary but mainly I want to know more > >> about the second issue first before trying it: > >> > > I now did that anyway and found at least skype and flash with my > > camera seem to behave the same as before: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/dvb/linux-v4l2-2.6.17-8-test.patch > > (for 8) > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/dvb/linux-v4l2-2.6.17-test.patch > > (for head, again untested) > > > > This loses a few features tho that _may_ be useful for other apps > > or later versions so I'm still not 100% sure this is a good idea... > > Thanks for testing. I try to get some time "soonish" (probably not > today) to commit this. After it is in the tree, I have a look at > updating the v4l* headers to the current version. > > The reason why I want to do it this way is, that in later version the > v4l* headers are a little bit reorganized and I do not want to > introduce some regressions (code or license). Sounds like a plan! :) Thanx, Juergen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110426170717.GB52945>