From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 9 16:17:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712C9106564A for ; Fri, 9 May 2008 16:17:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 482254ac@razorfever.net) Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BCC8FC14 for ; Fri, 9 May 2008 16:17:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 482254ac@razorfever.net) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhcFABcWJEhMCrCL/2dsb2JhbACBUxqpSg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,461,1204520400"; d="scan'208";a="20190245" Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca (HELO smtp.teksavvy.com) ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 09 May 2008 12:17:06 -0400 Received: from server.razorfever.net ([76.10.176.139]) by smtp.teksavvy.com (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id PVA03206; Fri, 09 May 2008 12:17:06 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.10] (newskool.razorfever.net [192.168.0.10]) by server.razorfever.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m49GH5To069783; Fri, 9 May 2008 12:17:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from 482254ac@razorfever.net) Message-ID: <48247901.3000706@razorfever.net> Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 12:17:05 -0400 From: "Derek (freebsd-ipfw)" <482254ac@razorfever.net> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org References: <9a542da30805080844t395c8c81sd313fc2fd1780fcb@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9a542da30805080844t395c8c81sd313fc2fd1780fcb@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?= Subject: Re: Dummynet, gif, and ipsec X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 16:17:07 -0000 Ermal Luçi wrote: > Well this is a patch to shape IPSec tunnels with ALTQ and FreeBSD 6.3 > as you are running. It is another alternative to dummynet though it > have been tested with pf but should work with ipfw too since it knows > about ALTQ. > Hope it helps! > Hi Ermal, Thanks for the response! I'm looking to roll this out on 5-7 machines, so I'm really looking for a solution where we wouldn't have to make changes to the kernel code and would be supported by the base system moving forward. Are you planning to submit a PR with this patch? Also are the m_tag, or altq_tag the same tags created with the ipfw tag command? -- Derek