Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 11:25:40 -0700 From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>, mjacob@feral.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci pci.c pcisupport.c pcivar.h Message-ID: <200006131825.LAA22754@mass.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 13 Jun 2000 20:12:10 %2B0200." <11848.960919930@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In message <200006131741.KAA22559@mass.cdrom.com>, Mike Smith writes: > >> > >> > The real situation is, in fact, just the opposite; there are *very* few > >> > devices for which it is not possible to obtain, in a generic fashion, a > >> > uniquifying token. > >> > >> So much so that the real issue now is "which one of 4 different drivers do > >> want for driving your tulip chip based NIC?" > > > >The one that's maintained by someone that I can chase around the office > >with the Damn Thing until he fixes it, of course. 8) > > Look at sys/dev/lmc and tell me if you want that to drive *your* tulip > based card :-) Well, if you bothered to use the right constant (PCIR_SUBVEND_0) you'd realise that you're still using part of the _STANDARD_ PCI technique for uniquely identifying a card. So no, your driver isn't going to match any of my Tulip cards. -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006131825.LAA22754>