Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:09:55 +1100 From: "Robert Leftwich" <freebsd@rtl.fmailbox.com> To: "Charles Swiger" <cswiger@mac.com> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Memory leak? Message-ID: <1139875795.19969.254293503@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1139875246.18972.254292031@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1139792505.30118.254198744@webmail.messagingengine.com> <43F0434F.2000703@locolomo.org> <1139826617.10634.254226042@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20060213214053.GA20537@panix.com> <1139868809.6940.254283466@webmail.messagingengine.com> <5A1E3F19-24CD-42ED-A945-A37E57EB8748@mac.com> <1139875246.18972.254292031@webmail.messagingengine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:00:46 +1100, "Robert Leftwich" > > I can't see anything that explains the discrepancy. Below is the top -o > size after a reboot, followed by the current top after 8 datasets (the > extra python process is the analysis app - at a low memory usage point): Oops, just noticed that the analysis app was at a *really* low memory usage point, i.e. it wasn't running at all, having spat the dummy on some bad data! So there wasn't any extra python app. Robert
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1139875795.19969.254293503>