From nobody Mon Oct 4 06:48:44 2021 X-Original-To: ports-bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A994417E72C9 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 06:48:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HNBBh4JjLz3lpj for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 06:48:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71F5914CA2 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 06:48:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1946miau061830 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 06:48:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 1946mihV061829 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 06:48:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 258675] mail/alpine: distinfo out of date for maildir.patch.gz Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 06:48:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: Trond.Endrestol@ximalas.info X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D258675 --- Comment #6 from Trond.Endrestol@ximalas.info --- (In reply to Trond.Endrestol from comment #4) I received this the other day: From: Eduardo Chappa [<] eduardo [.] chappa [@] gmx [.] com [>] To: Trond Endrest=C3=B8l [<] trond [.] endrestol [@] ximalas [.] info [>] Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2021 09:17:27 -0600 (MDT) Subject: Re: Recent change to maildir.patch.gz Dear Trond, thank you for your message. I imagine that you are referring to the chang= es between the initial release of the maildir patch, and the current release of the maildir patch. A user notified that his compiler failed to build alpine when patched with the maildir patch due to the existence of a non-declared function in the du= mmy driver. This needed modifications of the maildir patch. While I was on it, I also got rid of many warnings that the compiler gave me. This resulted in many changes to the patch. I am sorry that the combination of "patch" + version + SHA256 does not determine a unique "patch". The reason why this happens is because I someti= mes need to clear bugs in the code, and so the patch changes, making the corresponding change in the SHA256, which seems to be the issue you are having. I do publish the SHA256 sums, and they chan= ge not because I am evil towards you but because I need to make changes to the code. If you are interested in preserving the SHA256 you will have to downl= oad the patch to your site, but then you will not get any updates I might make. One more time I apologize for this inconvenience, but the behavior you ju= st found will continue happening when I need to fix bugs or add new features. = In the case that just happened, it was to solve issues with compilation for a compiler. I hope this helps. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=