Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:35:05 +0100
From:      Joerg Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
To:        freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Funny battery values (nx6325)
Message-ID:  <20100317163505.GI52442@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D8308585A0FBD6D@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com>
References:  <1268829363.6171.13.camel@RabbitsDen> <20100317224207.A85436@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20100317154327.04F841CC18@ptavv.es.net> <20100317161834.GH52442@uriah.heep.sax.de> <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D8308585A0FBD6D@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Moore, Robert wrote:

> There are two types of batteries, the "Smart Battery" and the
> so-called "Control Method Battery".

> AFAIK, by far, the control method battery is dominant. Smart
> batteries are rare.

Thanks, if all else (on the ACPI-level) fails, I'll remember
this.
-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100317163505.GI52442>