Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 Mar 1995 17:08:32 -0800 (PST)
From:      julian@TFS.COM (Julian Elischer)
To:        rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com (Rodney W. Grimes)
Cc:        phk@ref.tfs.com, ache@freefall.cdrom.com, CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-etc@freefall.cdrom.com
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/etc/etc.i386 rc.i386
Message-ID:  <m0ruVCT-0003w6C@TFS.COM>
In-Reply-To: <199503310041.QAA07064@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> from "Rodney W. Grimes" at Mar 30, 95 04:41:41 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 
> > 
> > > In BSD this has always been done by root editing /etc/rc.local, I never
> > > did like things that automagically went and f*cked around in /etc,
> > > I consider that evil and ugle.  
> > 
> > Rod, fine, you're entitled to your opinion.  So am I.
> > If you don't add it, I will.
> 
> You made a proposal, I said what I thought of it.  Others have stated
> things about it, and now Poul is makeing the decision :-(.
Rod, the comments were not totally against the suggestion, and 
Poul merely he wanted to add  SOMETHING ALONG THE LINES OF the sysV stuff
my suggestion is as follows..

scripts continue as at present. rc, rc.local
and we simply add an rc.d in which one can place startup scripts similar to 
sysV scripts (many packages come with these).

the order of running would be:
rc
rc.d/S[01234]* start
rc.local
rc.d/S[56789]* start

many systems have a file rc.network, which is as standard as /etc/netstart
so I'm a little sorry we stayed with netstart, but the documentation
argument was convincing..

> 
> Sorry folks, I can't deal with Poul's unilateral dictator ship any longer.
I think this is such a small thing it doesn't
require such heated discussion..

it requires adding a few lines to each script and creating the directory..
packages that want to use it can those that don't can use rc.local...

> 
> If we can't have decisions made by the group instead of ``what Poul wants''
> I am out of here.
The discussion hasn't been "everybody vs poul", and I thonk a compromise
should be possible...

julian





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m0ruVCT-0003w6C>