Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 21 Aug 2011 09:34:45 -0600
From:      Chad Perrin <>
To:        "''" <>
Subject:   Re: A quality operating system
Message-ID:  <20110821153445.GA25529@guilt.hydra>
In-Reply-To: <>
References:  <> <> <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:13:32PM -0500, Jorge Biquez wrote:
> Hello.
> ;=3D)   Thanks for the comments.. :=3D)
> No, I am curious what they decided to use that covers all the points=20
> , at least better that FreeBSD.
> Seriously I would like to see or hear about the comparison chart=20
> between all OSs. And a question arrive to my mind... if for some=20
> reason, I know it is impossible, but if for some reason FreeBSD would=20
> stop existing... serious users of FreeBSD, what would be your next OS? Wh=

I'd have to do some serious thinking about the comparative benefits of
DragonFly BSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, and a number of Linux distributions.  I
have a sneaking suspicion I'd end up with NetBSD or OpenBSD, though.

Note that I'm talking about my "primary" OS of choice.  I use OSes other
than FreeBSD already for specific purposes (i.e., Win7 for portability
testing, OpenBSD for firewall/router).

Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: ]

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>