Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:56:57 +0100
From:      Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
To:        HU Dong <itechbear@gmail.com>, thomas.sander@gmx.de
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: why kdbg hasn't been upgraded?
Message-ID:  <CADLo83_Wh54BgbZQc46BF5qv=Y06CrWWjj_FbKLF7npLNZ1nOA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA96eVtLSLipErNOCotjg1Z65rLNv97hQsYrpRy3GH0SaUCS=w@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAA96eVtLSLipErNOCotjg1Z65rLNv97hQsYrpRy3GH0SaUCS=w@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Copying in maintainer.
On 10 Aug 2012 10:42, "HU Dong" <itechbear@gmail.com> wrote:

> kdbg has been upgraded to 2.5.1 with qt4 library, while the port
> devel/kdbg is still 2.2.0 with qt3 library. I modified the port a
> little and had it successfully built. Is there any reason that it
> should stay with the older version? If not, I'll submit a PR.
>
> B.R.
> HU Dong
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83_Wh54BgbZQc46BF5qv=Y06CrWWjj_FbKLF7npLNZ1nOA>