Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Aug 1999 12:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
From:      "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
To:        billf@jade.chc-chimes.com (Bill Fumerola)
Cc:        imp@village.org (Warner Losh), bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans), dynamo@ime.net, security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Not sure if you got it...
Message-ID:  <199908301914.MAA66340@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908301316110.48614-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com> from Bill Fumerola at "Aug 30, 1999 01:17:24 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> 
> > > I'd also like to have a new flag to rm.  -F.  One -F will be
> > > 	chflags nouflags foo ; rm -f foo
> > > while two -F will be
> > > 	chflags 0 foo ; rm -f foo
> > 
> > I have a problem with this, it means updating 1 more chunk of code
> > should the set of items in uflags change.  
> 
> Or updating rc if uflags change.

chflags nouflags foo in /etc/rc* would not need to change if uflags
changes.  chflags might, but not /etc/rc*


-- 
Rod Grimes - KD7CAX - (RWG25)                    rgrimes@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908301914.MAA66340>