Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 13:56:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: time_t not to change size on x86 Message-ID: <200110272056.f9RKuiZ64324@apollo.backplane.com> References: <20011027070109.D02E9380A@overcee.netplex.com.au> <200110272007.f9RK7NG88372@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <200110272029.f9RKTIi56468@apollo.backplane.com> <200110272049.f9RKn9K88676@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:
:<<On Sat, 27 Oct 2001 13:29:18 -0700 (PDT), Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> said:
:
:> If time_t can be a double, it damn
:> well can be an int64_t.
:
:No, it can't. RTFS.
:
:-GAWollman
We are still waiting to see what both C90 and C99 say. As DES would
say, quote the standard. So far nothing I've heard prevents us from
being able to make time_t a 64 bit int on IA32.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@backplane.com>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200110272056.f9RKuiZ64324>