From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Mar 30 4:26:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from smtp10.atl.mindspring.net (smtp10.atl.mindspring.net [207.69.200.246]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794C237B64D for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 04:26:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca2-07.ix.netcom.com [205.186.212.7]) by smtp10.atl.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA10450; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 07:26:34 -0500 (EST) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id EAA14922; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 04:26:32 -0800 (PST) To: Ade Lovett Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: final call: VERSION variable References: <200003300345.TAA12994@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <20000329222346.F312@lovett.com> From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 30 Mar 2000 04:26:30 -0800 In-Reply-To: Ade Lovett's message of "Wed, 29 Mar 2000 22:23:46 -0600" Message-ID: Lines: 14 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.6 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: Ade Lovett * The only thing that worries me about this is that "it will touch * almost every single Makefile". * * Now, there have been sporadic threads about the "Version required" * comment at the top, which, if we delete it, will also touch every * single Makefile, so instead of two sweeps through the tree, if we * combine them, we only have one. Sorry, should have mentioned that I'm planning to delete that comment from most of the Makefiles as part of the sweep too. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message