Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:50:37 +0100 (CET)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Geoff Fritz <gfritz@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Cooking LLVM in FreeBSD 8
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903171847210.58509@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <20090317155123.GA6295@dev.null>
References:  <CF72636E-0A45-4970-BAF0-FDD53C8456B7@yahoo.fr> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903171347550.57834@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20090317140221.GA85698@dev.null> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903171518220.58104@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20090317155123.GA6295@dev.null>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
>> master FreeBSD sources.
>
> Please don't read too much into my remark, as I don't like to engage in
> license ideology debates.   I like GPL, BSD, and all the zillions of other

i do use GPL programs too without any problems - because there is 
no BSD licenced equivalent (most often), or BSD licenced equivalent is 
much weaker (rare cases).

but it doesn't change what i said. GPL licence is unacceptable if you want 
to make any commercial product based on code licenced that way.

FREEDOM CAN NOT BE ENFORCED.

> open source variants.  In my pre-coffee mental haze this morning, I didn't
> phrase it in such a way to denote that it was mostly a toungue-in-cheek
> comment about the motivation to replace the venerable gcc from the base
> system (which, for technical reasons, I personally feel to be a worthy
> goal).
>
> -- Geoff
>
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0903171847210.58509>