From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 17 17:50:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100B4106566B for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:50:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A73628FC0C for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:50:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2HHocmJ058513; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:50:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n2HHobEr058510; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:50:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:50:37 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Geoff Fritz In-Reply-To: <20090317155123.GA6295@dev.null> Message-ID: References: <20090317140221.GA85698@dev.null> <20090317155123.GA6295@dev.null> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cooking LLVM in FreeBSD 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:50:50 -0000 >> master FreeBSD sources. > > Please don't read too much into my remark, as I don't like to engage in > license ideology debates. I like GPL, BSD, and all the zillions of other i do use GPL programs too without any problems - because there is no BSD licenced equivalent (most often), or BSD licenced equivalent is much weaker (rare cases). but it doesn't change what i said. GPL licence is unacceptable if you want to make any commercial product based on code licenced that way. FREEDOM CAN NOT BE ENFORCED. > open source variants. In my pre-coffee mental haze this morning, I didn't > phrase it in such a way to denote that it was mostly a toungue-in-cheek > comment about the motivation to replace the venerable gcc from the base > system (which, for technical reasons, I personally feel to be a worthy > goal). > > -- Geoff > >