Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:59:04 -0600 From: Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> To: Max Brazhnikov <makc@issp.ac.ru> Cc: "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <unixmania@gmail.com>, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/137373: x11/libX11: make dependance on x11/libxcb Message-ID: <1261317544.2315.52.camel@balrog.2hip.net> In-Reply-To: <200912201011.20455.makc@issp.ac.ru> References: <200912192220.nBJMK8xo025223@freefall.freebsd.org> <1261278141.2315.47.camel@balrog.2hip.net> <e71790db0912191906j2f830ed0s26d8224064cf810b@mail.gmail.com> <200912201011.20455.makc@issp.ac.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 10:11 +0300, Max Brazhnikov wrote: > On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 01:06:37 -0200, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Robert Noland <rnoland@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 00:30 -0200, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: > > > > .... > > > > >> Is it acceptable a patch allowing to diable XCB without a menu? The > > >> default behavior is kept but users can put "WITHOUT_XCB=true" in > > >> /etc/make.conf, ensuring that all ports are built the same way. > > > > > > If it is defined as a KNOB and all of the ports override the option if > > > the KNOB is set, then yes I'm ok with it. I just don't want an option, > > > since it makes foot shooting easier. > > > > > > robert. > > > > Ok, I will submit a followup with an new patch. > > As KDE (and several multimedia ports) maintainer I object to having xcb knob > in x11 ports. Turning it off will break plist and/or build of these ports, > they does require libx11 compiled with xcb support. Well, I don't get why anyone would not want it. I have had discussions with other Xorg folk about making it mandatory for X. robert. > Max > -- Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1261317544.2315.52.camel>