From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 20 13:59:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D307A106566C for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:59:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCFB8FC12 for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:59:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (adsl-156-16-112.bna.bellsouth.net [70.156.16.112]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.2hip.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBKDxAFk051061 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 20 Dec 2009 08:59:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) From: Robert Noland To: Max Brazhnikov In-Reply-To: <200912201011.20455.makc@issp.ac.ru> References: <200912192220.nBJMK8xo025223@freefall.freebsd.org> <1261278141.2315.47.camel@balrog.2hip.net> <200912201011.20455.makc@issp.ac.ru> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: FreeBSD Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:59:04 -0600 Message-Id: <1261317544.2315.52.camel@balrog.2hip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gizmo.2hip.net Cc: "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" , freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/137373: x11/libX11: make dependance on x11/libxcb X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:59:14 -0000 On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 10:11 +0300, Max Brazhnikov wrote: > On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 01:06:37 -0200, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Robert Noland wrote: > > > On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 00:30 -0200, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: > > > > .... > > > > >> Is it acceptable a patch allowing to diable XCB without a menu? The > > >> default behavior is kept but users can put "WITHOUT_XCB=true" in > > >> /etc/make.conf, ensuring that all ports are built the same way. > > > > > > If it is defined as a KNOB and all of the ports override the option if > > > the KNOB is set, then yes I'm ok with it. I just don't want an option, > > > since it makes foot shooting easier. > > > > > > robert. > > > > Ok, I will submit a followup with an new patch. > > As KDE (and several multimedia ports) maintainer I object to having xcb knob > in x11 ports. Turning it off will break plist and/or build of these ports, > they does require libx11 compiled with xcb support. Well, I don't get why anyone would not want it. I have had discussions with other Xorg folk about making it mandatory for X. robert. > Max > -- Robert Noland FreeBSD