From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 10 23:26:02 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4A91065673
	for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:26:02 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from raven.customer.vol.cz (raven.customer.vol.cz [195.250.144.108])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD10B8FC1B
	for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:26:01 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [192.168.0.23] (r5af140.net.upc.cz [86.49.39.140])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by raven.customer.vol.cz (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n0ANPskp013408; 
	Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:25:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
To: Alexander Churanov <alexanderchuranov@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3cb459ed0901101407m2c72487aqf35ea2c81761290e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3cb459ed0901091434y3ec4cb5cr56bf358b527515d7@mail.gmail.com>
	<1231602062.44156.28.camel@hood.oook.cz>
	<3cb459ed0901101407m2c72487aqf35ea2c81761290e@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-4LgeYFr7ZIRfnJO7+ED8"
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:25:54 +0100
Message-Id: <1231629954.10829.0.camel@hood.oook.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
X-Spam-Score: -1.708 () AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 195.250.144.108
X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: raven.customer.vol.cz; Sender-ip: 86.49.39.140;
	Sender-helo: [192.168.0.23]; )
Cc: Simon Barner <barner@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: STILL OPEN: ports/129226: update devel/boost from 1.34.1 to 1.37
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:26:02 -0000


--=-4LgeYFr7ZIRfnJO7+ED8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Alexander Churanov p=ED=B9e v ne 11. 01. 2009 v 01:07 +0300:
> 2009/1/10 Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org>
>        =20
>         Are you also willing to fix all the applications that will not
>         work with
>         the new version of boost?
>        =20
>         I understand that's the only concern preventing new boost from
>         being
>         committed.
>        =20
>=20
> Why not fix it in several steps? :
>=20
> 1) rename devel/boost to devel/boost-134
> 2) switch all ports depending on devel/boost to devel/boost-134
> 3) check-in boost-1.37 as devel/boost
> 4) have enough time to fix applications depending on boost-1.34
> one-by-one
>=20
> This introduces another level of indirection - a common way to solve
> issues like that

That's certainly a possibility -- but can two boost versions coexist in
a single system?

--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
              <pav@FreeBSD.org>
Alignment: Neutral Greedy

--=-4LgeYFr7ZIRfnJO7+ED8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEABECAAYFAklpLn0ACgkQntdYP8FOsoKy+ACdGoPSRmsHqgMQ14qRx1yStxK5
Aj0AoJqtvMQwfMSfi0D2zRFjnZewxC/t
=zBnc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-4LgeYFr7ZIRfnJO7+ED8--