Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 4 Jun 2017 12:38:13 -0400
From:      Baho Utot <baho-utot@columbus.rr.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Looking at base source code
Message-ID:  <81220e19-5473-6258-53d1-2bee2e8c7698@columbus.rr.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170604172037.019ac1e8@gumby.homeunix.com>
References:  <81583349-8374-fe21-a75b-fb0e30ccb772@columbus.rr.com> <20170604172037.019ac1e8@gumby.homeunix.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 06/04/17 12:20, RW via freebsd-questions wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 11:54:56 -0400
> Baho Utot wrote:
> 
>> Are the svn code repos for 11.0-RELEASE and 11.0-RELENG the same?
>>
>> The docs/handbook seem to say that they are.
> 
> Unless something has changed RELEASE doesn't have security updates and
> RELENG does.

Ok Thanks

I am confused with this whole release stuff as I see the following

release-11.0.0
release-11.0.1
releng-11.0

I have been tracking releng-11.0 in the past and I am on 11.0-p9 which 
shows as this in uname -a:

FreeBSD desktop.example.com 11.0-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p9 #0 
r316958: Sat Apr 15 09:25:18 EDT 2017 
root@desktop.example.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  amd64

Is release-11.0.1 the same as releng-11.0-p9?

So is tracking releng correct or should I be tracking 11.0.1?






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?81220e19-5473-6258-53d1-2bee2e8c7698>