From owner-freebsd-chat  Thu Oct 30 18:37:21 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA03197
          for chat-outgoing; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 18:37:21 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA03190
          for <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 18:37:18 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id SAA06245; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 18:36:57 -0800 (PST)
To: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
cc: The Classiest Man Alive <ksmm@cybercom.net>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: svgalib? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 30 Oct 1997 14:27:37 PST."
             <199710302227.OAA10596@rah.star-gate.com> 
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 18:36:57 -0800
Message-ID: <6242.878265417@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Nope you are the funny guy. The task of making XF86Setup idiot proof
> clearly falls into the category of not interesting to hackers.    
> So far there are two possible courses:
> 1. byte the bullet with respect to the existing status quo
> 2. fund a project to address the issue

But I don't have funding for such a project nor am I likely to anytime
soon.

> However there is the real possibility that the XFree86 project can indeed
> tackle the issue.

That would be good, yes.

					Jordan