Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 17 Jun 2005 21:24:15 +0200
From:      Wilko Bulte <wb@freebie.xs4all.nl>
To:        Alan Cox <alc@cs.rice.edu>
Cc:        Alan Cox <alc@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/vm uma_int.h
Message-ID:  <20050617192415.GA35940@freebie.xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20050617174658.GK5251@cs.rice.edu>
References:  <200506161706.j5GH6YgW038252@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050617063914.GA1097@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050617174658.GK5251@cs.rice.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 12:46:58PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote..
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 11:39:14PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 05:06:34PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > alc         2005-06-16 17:06:34 UTC
> > > 
> > >   FreeBSD src repository
> > > 
> > >   Modified files:
> > >     sys/vm               uma_int.h 
> > >   Log:
> > >   Increase UMA_BOOT_PAGES to prevent a crash during initialization.  See
> > >   http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42AD8270.8060906 for a detailed
> > >   description of the crash.
> > 
> > Today, I finally got a traceback of my insta-reboots after marius' atkbd
> > commit (2005-06-10 20:56:38 UTC) and it was exactly this same traceback.
> > Funny that such an innocuous commit started causing my 'i386' workstation
> > to panic.  We were that much on the edge of having enough UMA_BOOT_PAGES?
> > Is 48 enough?
> 
> I recall that 42 was the minimum to fix Eric's panic.  I chose 48 so

Of course it should be 42...

:-P

-- 
Wilko Bulte				wilko@FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050617192415.GA35940>