From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 2 09:10:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660F716A40E; Fri, 2 Feb 2007 09:10:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rizzo@icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AB313C474; Fri, 2 Feb 2007 09:10:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rizzo@icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.11/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l129AjlP092251; Fri, 2 Feb 2007 01:10:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.11/8.12.3/Submit) id l129AjWs092250; Fri, 2 Feb 2007 01:10:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 01:10:45 -0800 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Stanislav Sedov Message-ID: <20070202011045.A91980@xorpc.icir.org> References: <20070201111727.B83474@xorpc.icir.org> <20070201192051.GA72926@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070201113720.D83474@xorpc.icir.org> <20070201194417.GA73296@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070201123026.C84181@xorpc.icir.org> <20070201204153.GA74138@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070201140124.A85626@xorpc.icir.org> <20070202115752.738ac6ac.stas@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20070202115752.738ac6ac.stas@FreeBSD.org>; from stas@FreeBSD.org on Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 11:57:52AM +0300 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: /usr/local/share/mk ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 09:10:46 -0000 On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 11:57:52AM +0300, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:01:24 -0800 > Luigi Rizzo mentioned: > > > > typo.. thanks. Speaking of names, what's best for the devel/ thing ? > > linux-bsd-kmod looks like just another module. Should i call it > > linux-kmod-compat or bsd-linux-kmod instead ? > > > > Personally, I think linux-kmod-compat or linux-kmod-devkit would > sound better. BTW, I believe this should live in compat, not devel. we don't seem to have a "compat" ports category, don't we ? and i don't think this goes into the base system, or at least i don't have a good clue on the licensing issues yet - there are things i have rewritten from scratch, there are others (headers mostly, plus short inline functions) i just copied from GPL sources, and the modules themselves that you can build generally come from GPL sources. A port seems the safest option from that point of view... cheers luigi > PS: thanks for working on a such useful thing! > > -- > Stanislav Sedov > ST4096-RIPE