Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 30 Mar 2013 02:52:41 +0100
From:      Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd>
To:        Andre Goree <andre@drenet.info>
Cc:        "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Proper way to update ports with svn
Message-ID:  <CAE63ME5cqf_AOUFrZ=WyUDf1OR92HCxQL3iNJXCAOUKhMW26Xw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <515607C1.2010701@drenet.info>
References:  <515607C1.2010701@drenet.info>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On 29 March 2013 22:29, Andre Goree <andre@drenet.info> wrote:

> I seem to have to run 'make index' in /usr/ports after I've run 'svn up
> /usr/ports' in order to see which ports need to be updated using
> 'portversion'.  This doesn't seem correct...and if so portsnap would
> seem like a much better tool.  Perhaps I should be running 'make
> fetchindex' instead?  I'm sure I've read about the correct way to do so,
> but it doesn't appear to be here:
> https://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsSubversionPrimer
>
> Thanks in advance for any advice.
>

'make index' looks good to me, it's the right way to do things imo.

What bothers you, following 'make index', pkg version output seems dodgy ?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAE63ME5cqf_AOUFrZ=WyUDf1OR92HCxQL3iNJXCAOUKhMW26Xw>