Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 9 May 2007 06:47:30 -0300
From:      AT Matik <>
Cc:        Kirk Davis <>, Julian Elischer <>
Subject:   Re: Policy Routing natd+ipfw
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References:  <> <> <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Monday 07 May 2007 19:05:31 Kirk Davis wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > in -current you can implement a routing table via FWD and tables.
> > in  6.x you need to specify the next hop. and an more explicit rule.
>    Is there any information floating around on how to do this in current
> using the FWD rules and tables? Any pointer on where to look.
>    Right now I am using fwd rules on our BGP router (Quagga & FreeBSD
> 6.2) to force one of our subnets out a particular interface and avoid
> the routing table but I would prefer to do it more like a dual routing
> table where I can make more routing decisions than just forcing all
> packets from that subnet out the interface.  I could test it on one of
> our current boxes.

I do not know enough about quagga but if you really run BGP and quagga does=
what BGP is supposed to do I wuold say you shoudl use policy route-map=20
filters for that purpose


A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>