From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 14 16:06:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3593116A423 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:06:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rik@inse.ru) Received: from mail.inse.ru (inse.ru [144.206.128.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C602D43D49 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:06:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rik@inse.ru) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (www.inse.ru [144.206.128.1]) by mail.inse.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A0133C27; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 19:06:48 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <4416EB03.9010001@inse.ru> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 19:10:43 +0300 From: Roman Kurakin User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060131) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eygene Ryabinkin References: <20060314155610.GA990@rea.mbslab.kiae.ru> In-Reply-To: <20060314155610.GA990@rea.mbslab.kiae.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: RFC kern/9448 (was Re: Two network-related PRs) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:06:49 -0000 Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Good day! > I've made two PRs (and pathes for them) that are related to the networking > subsystem. > > URL: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=94408 > Name: kern/94408: if_bridge breaks proxy ARP functionality > Description: > Proxy ARP entries will not be correctly processed if they belongs to the > bridged interface: other interface from this bridge will not get the replies > for this ARP record. > > URL: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=94448 > Name: kern/94448: if_bridge modifies IP length and offset fields for > broadcast packets > Description: > In some curcumstances if_bridge will modify the 'length' and 'offset' fields > of IP packet for Ethernet broadcasts: bytes will be transformed from the > network to the host byte order. > This one looks very serious. Some code after pf could modify packet and all other copies would also be modified. Patch looks good for me. rik > Please, have a look. If anyone can try this patches, I will be glad to > hear about the results. I'll be glad if someone will commit them into > -CURRENT, 6.x and 5.x. > > Thanks! >