Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 22:06:02 +0100 (CET) From: Søren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk> To: Scott Long <scott_long@btc.adaptec.com> Cc: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net>, "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Thomas Quinot <thomas@cuivre.fr.eu.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Updated ATAPI/CAM patches Message-ID: <200202282106.g1SL62U02937@freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <1014928652.6021.5.camel@hollin.btc.adaptec.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems Scott Long wrote: > > As I have stated several times, I have no problem with ATAPI being > > sent through CAM as long as the usual way stays (some of us cannot > > afford the weight of those extra layers, nor loose functionality). > > I'd do the integration somewhat differently to even further minimise > > the diffs, but that is really not the issue here... > > So if we can get *serious* commitment from a committer to take up > > these loose ends, lets talk about what to do, if not my offer stands :) > > I'll raise my hand here. I've been keenly interested in this for a > while, since it will make my UDF work much simpler. I'm also getting my Hmm, your UDF code should know nothing about the lower layers, but we've been over that already :) > feet wet in CAM, and I have the two CAM gurus nearby if things get too > hairy. I fully indend for this to be a cooperative effort with Thomas; > I'm mainly raising my hand to take the abuse that will no doubt happen > once in a while. Sure, maybe we should make Thomas a committer so he could look after it himself ? Interested ? Got the time ? I'm all ears for volounteers... -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200202282106.g1SL62U02937>