Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 15:57:07 +0300 From: Sergei Kolobov <sergei@FreeBSD.org> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports MOVED Message-ID: <20031217125707.GD719@chetwood.ru> In-Reply-To: <20031217105028.GA68418@FreeBSD.org> References: <20031217060754.GA714@chetwood.ru> <20031217105028.GA68418@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--1Y7d0dPL928TPQbc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2003-12-17 at 02:50 -0800, Eivind Eklund wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:07:54AM +0300, Sergei Kolobov wrote: > > I have mixed feelings about this myself, however: > > - the software refers to itself as "MailScanner", in Perl module name, > > all paths and filenames >=20 > Perl module name? I've not looked really closely at the port, but this m= ight > indicate that the correct rename would be p5-MailScanner=20 No, I don't think so. > (though the install instructions refer to replacing the MTA startup > settings in rc.conf, so I doubt it.) Yes, you're right. ;) > If not, I would think mailscanner is the right name. See > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook= /makefile-naming.html > section 4.2.4. Ok, but would it be correct then to repo-move mail/MailScanner to mail/mailscanner, but still have PORTNAME=3DMailScanner? Sergei --1Y7d0dPL928TPQbc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/4FKjFOxuaTulNAERAmOBAJ9tehnvj2Wll5KqeF2WAJ8/v4JM9gCdGfTp GiaHOoCtVoS/s5ZaZxUy83o= =DIoi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1Y7d0dPL928TPQbc--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031217125707.GD719>