Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 00:23:20 -0800 (PST) From: Joseph Koshy <jkoshy> To: dg@root.com Cc: des, cvs-committers, cvs-all, marcs@znep.com, dillon@apollo.backplane.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf options param.c src/sys/kern init_sysent.c syscalls.c syscalls.master uipc_syscalls.c src/sys/sys mbuf.h socket.h socketvar.h syscall-hide.h syscall.h syscall.mk sysproto.h src/sys/vm vm_object.c Message-ID: <199811060823.AAA03217@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 06 Nov 1998 00:05:41 PST." <199811060805.AAA12763@implode.root.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>> "ms" == "Mark Slemko", "dg" == "David Greenman" ms> I'm sure it will make a huge difference in the benchmarks, but I doubt ms> you would notice much of a difference in real-life performance except dg> I did put a lot of work into this and I'm proud of the results. Slight change of topic: Has anyone looked at Chuck Cranor's UVM (currently in NetBSD?). I think I remember some of the NetBSD folks touting UVM as a more general solution to the multiple-copy problem in the kernel. I did browse Chuck's Phd thesis but folding in UVM to FreeBSD is currently beyond my skill level in the kernel. Koshy <jkoshy@freebsd.org> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199811060823.AAA03217>