From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 7 21:52:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4981065676; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 21:52:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f185.google.com (mail-pz0-f185.google.com [209.85.222.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFAF58FC08; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 21:52:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk15 with SMTP id 15so11183008pzk.3 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:52:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=m52uBTWfTumUtXuG/CFGGZxi6V1Vby0hbcuRBQxpsIE=; b=hQVBjFNp/+m0I9lz1HIoHGQ+3bKlBqToKRjJAjRs9Uv3KREAjkn+XtkbshgcqMKIwk uvOJqUjqTqv7hDcX45gOfcHz9+7s2bKI/YR6xh54NNfJGZJySym5xyEAjZr5ov0pDgBs 3cRvx7/oJCterjE/G/C5XhlaHm2X5iJTqM7gE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=SKokQ0PthMCxSiieSbrEB0mLvzibTdC4UAMKMT6Qjhsb9/LGCbnvYEGyDBMtiH/+gw e1kgwSOCSjSFt2p7kSLTMlZi/Z8j5YT931BkCkXkrIM8nEYoO/cRYwhKo/4pBis+3MVD YZA+2kaYvOhEj3S3NH/40GQzC2h3Pz7nlgvXU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.89.11 with SMTP id r11mr1910835rvl.285.1262901171129; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:52:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 22:52:51 +0100 Message-ID: <786602c61001071352k4bde5e98xa6875253cb84a90f@mail.gmail.com> From: Thomas Zander To: FreeBSD - Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Martin Wilke Subject: Call for testers - mplayer svn port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 21:52:53 -0000 Hi, thanks to Wes Morgan and Martin Wilke there is something for you to test which approximates what's going to become our next mplayer in the ports tree. Due to the vast number of changes between the last official release of mplayer and the current svn version and the significant changes we did to the port, I am almost certain you will stumble upon regressions. Furthermore, because of the large number of possible OPTIONS and combinations thereof, it might or might not even build for you. Over the next weeks I aim to stabilise the build process on different configurations and reduce the regressions that users might encounter when we finally commit this to the ports tree. I trust that you report problems that you run into on the mailing list and - if possible - please please send patches to me that solve a particular regression for you. To the topic: On http://www.rrr.de/~riggs/mplayer/m20100107.tar.bz2 you can get a small tarball. It contains three items: The ports for mplayer and mencoder. Both are drop-in replacements for the respective directories in ${PORTSDIR}/multimedia This should work without further changes (at least it does on my amd64 test machine). NOTE that ONLY if you want to test it with x264 (only available for mencoder, mplayer uses ffmpeg's internal h264 decoder now.), you HAVE to apply the supplied x264 patch to ${PORTSDIR}/multimedia/x264. Thank you in advance and good luck Riggs