Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 08:49:42 +1030 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai@bart.nl> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ab.ca> Subject: Re: status of 'device awe' ? Message-ID: <XFMail.000223084942.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20000222132327.O5555@lucifer.bart.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22-Feb-00 Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > Should be used instead. > I am so in favor of just declaring voxware dead... But the armchair > generals wouldn't like that. The awe device controls the AWE's wavetable.. newpcm doesn't talk to this (yet - no idea if there are any plans) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.000223084942.doconnor>